27 May

Krueger, Dinowitz Introduce Nation-Leading Climate Change Superfund Act

Albany – Today Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, Chair of the Assembly Codes Committee, and State Senator Liz Krueger, Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, along with environmental advocates and experts, announced the introduction of the Climate Change Superfund Act (S.9417).

Full video of the announcement can be viewed by clicking here.

In light of the billions of dollars in damages that New York State has suffered as a result of climate change, and the tens of billions more to come in future decades, this first-in-the-nation legislation will use the polluter-pays model exemplified by existing federal and state superfund laws to collect $30 billion over ten years for climate change adaptation from the parties most responsible for causing the climate crisis – fossil fuel companies.

Right now consumers are facing pain at the pump as well as in their gas and electric bills. At the same time, the oil and gas industry is raking in enormous profits.The Climate Change Superfund Act will claw back some of the oil and gas industry’s recent windfall profits and use them for adaptation costs that would otherwise be charged to state taxpayers. The program is designed to prevent such costs from being passed on to consumers.

“The climate crisis is here, right now, and it’s already causing billions of dollars in damage and a growing death toll in New York State,” said Senator Krueger. “We must begin to make the investments necessary not only to mitigate future climate change, but to adapt to and defend ourselves from the damage that’s already been done. The cost of inaction is inconceivable – in money, in lives, and in countless other ways. Nonetheless, there will be a large price-tag to the work we have to do, and it’s only fair that the companies who made the mess should pay for cleaning it up. The Climate Change Superfund Act is one critical piece of the puzzle of funding our state’s response to the climate emergency.”

“The damage done to our climate and to our communities from decades of corporate disregard for scientific evidence is irreparable and omnipresent,” said Assemblyman Dinowitz. “As we continue to take big steps towards a green future in order to mitigate the worst potential impacts from climate change, the Climate Change Superfund Act would be a vital resource to invest in adaptive and resilient infrastructure, and it is common sense to charge those who did the most damage to our climate for the costs of keeping people alive amidst our new climate reality.”

“The climate crisis is a global emergency that is taking a devastating toll locally, and we know who bears responsibility: the fossil fuel industry whose business model directly results in catastrophic levels of greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the habitability of our planet. We see this as more frequent and extreme weather events destroy lives and livelihoods, such as Hurricane Ida. We see it with chronic flooding that strains our water infrastructure and extreme heat that exacerbates energy poverty and endangers our community members. It’s long overdue for the fossil fuel companies to pay for the damage they’ve caused our communities, particularly to Black and brown communities. New York is leading the way with the Climate Change Superfund Act,” said Rep. Jamaal Bowman. “In Congress, I worked with my Democratic colleagues to advance a similar assessment of past greenhouse gas emissions by fossil fuel companies in Build Back Better, and as the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report shows, we need bold action urgently. FEMA and other disaster relief can only do so much – we need long term solutions that face the climate crisis head on, and holding the fossil fuel industry accountable for their corporate greed is a necessary part of that work.”

New Yorkers are already experiencing significant impacts from the climate crisis – deadly superstorms, heatwaves, flooding, toxic algal blooms, extreme weather of all kinds, and billions of dollars in damage to property and critical infrastructure. According to one recent study, by the middle of this century, the damage caused by climate change could cost New York State nearly $10 billion dollars every year.

The Climate Change Superfund Act is grounded in the well-established polluter-pays principle exemplified in New York’s Hazardous Waste Site Remediation Program, known as the state superfund law, and the state Oil Spill Cleanup Fund, and applies it to the greenhouse gas emissions that have destabilized the climate. The biggest historical producers of fossil fuels will be charged a share of the costs necessary for New York State to adapt to climate change. The money raised through the climate superfund will be used to fund infrastructure projects within the state that are necessary to adapt to baked-in climate change by, for example, repairing damage from extreme weather events or upgrading coastal infrastructure.

Like the existing state superfund program and the Oil Spill Cleanup Fund, polluters would be strictly liable for damages under the Climate Change Superfund Act. No showing of fault or negligence is required. The program is remedial in nature, seeking compensation for damages resulting from the past actions of polluters. The bill would require that the fossil fuel companies help pay for a portion of the cost of necessary climate change-adaptive infrastructure based on their individual shares of total greenhouse gas emissions beginning in the year 2000.

The total claim assessed against the fossil fuel industry as a whole would be $30 billion, payable over ten years. To put that in perspective, Gazprom, the Russian fossil fuel company, made $29 billion in profits last year alone. ExxonMobil made nearly $6 billion in profits in just the first quarter of this year.

Two factors make it possible for the state to determine the proportionate responsibility that individual companies bear for historical greenhouse gas emissions. First, based on the research of Dr. Richard Heede, it is now possible to use company records to determine the amount of product put into the marketplace by each large fossil fuel company and to translate that into an amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere. The formula for doing so is specifically written into the bill language. Second, because the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is roughly constant everywhere on the planet, if a particular company is responsible for X% of global historical greenhouse gas emissions, that percentage is the same at any location on Earth.

Because the assessments are sunk costs that do not affect the marginal cost of the product being sold, textbook economics says that the cost will generally not be passed on to consumers. In addition, because companies will not be paying the same assessment amount, there will be market pressure preventing companies with larger assessments from charging more for their product when competing against companies that faced smaller assessments.

The program would be administered by DEC, which would issue the assessments to responsible companies and collect payments. Funds would be dispersed to qualifying climate change adaptive infrastructure projects, which are defined as projects designed to avoid, moderate, or repair damage caused by climate change. These would include, for example, storm water drainage systems, coastal wetlands restoration, defensive upgrades to roads, bridges, and subways, air conditioning and other upgrades to schools and public buildings, as well as projects to adapt to damage to agricultural land or fisheries.

In line with the requirements of the CLCPA, at least 35% of expenditures will go to projects that directly benefit disadvantaged communities.

Blair Horner, Executive Director, NYPIRG, said: “The burning of oil and gas has stuck New York — and the world — with billions of dollars of costs to adapt to the worsening climate. Now, those same companies are raking in enormous profits, while New Yorkers are getting stuck again — with skyrocketing energy costs. This innovative legislation will force the oil and gas industries to pick up at least some of the state’s financial tab triggered by global warming and will do so in a manner that protects consumers. NYPIRG applauds Senator Krueger’s and Assemblymember Dinowitz’s Climate Change Superfund and urges Governor Hochul and state lawmakers to support it.”

Peter M. Iwanowicz, Executive Director, Environmental Advocates NY, said: “In order to be successful, New York must employ a comprehensive approach to fighting climate change. Much like tobacco companies and opioid producers have been made to pay for the damage they have wrought, we must hold polluters accountable for the harm they have done while continuing to advance efforts to prevent future harm. This bill is innovative, timely, and ultimately necessary if we are serious about addressing the impacts of climate change.”

Roger Downs, Conservation Director, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, said: “Fossil fuel companies for decades have helped plunge our planet into the climate crisis, and during times of global economic unrest have reaped excessive profits while the world endures increasingly severe storms, floods, droughts, heatwaves, mass extinctions and public health emergencies. New York state is struggling to finance the transition to a zero emissions society and repair the damage caused by climatic shifts and sea level rise – and the communities that have contributed the least to climate change now bear the economic burden of its worst impacts. The Sierra Club applauds Senator Krueger and Assemblymember Dinowitz for recognizing the need for a robust polluter penalty and the creation of a climate fund that can turn these ill gotten fossil fuel windfalls into a vehicle for climate justice.”

Richard Schrader, NY Legislative and Policy Director, NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council), said: “The effects of climate change are threatening our health, our communities, our economy, and our future. This bill ensures that New York’s frontline communities are able to become more resilient against the impacts of climate change. Fossil fuel companies continue to try to undermine the state’s landmark climate law, the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which set a goal of 40% carbon emission reduction by 2030.”

Dr. Frederick Kowal, President, United University Professions, said: “The Climate Emergency is real and has impacted under-resourced communities of color severely. To address this environmental injustice, we must look to fossil fuel companies who for decades polluted with impunity, and continue to exacerbate the ecological emergency we find ourselves in today. The Climate Change Superfund Act proposed by Sen. Krueger and Assemblyman Dinowitz forces fossil fuel conglomerates—who have raked in enormous profits while causing extensive climate damage—to pay up for the damage they’ve caused. This legislation protects all New Yorkers, especially those communities who have been impacted most by climate change. United University Professions urges Governor Hochul and state legislators to support this important bill.”

This groundbreaking legislation has already stimulated interest from environmental activists beyond New York.

Mike Tidwell, Director, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said: “Finally! This New York State bill forces polluters to pay for climate damages. It also points the way for other states. Climate change affects us all — and the polluters should pay everywhere. My state of Maryland is paying attention and eager to follow. Same with D.C. and other Mid-Atlantic states.”

Alan Palm350 Mass, said: “The impacts of unchecked climate change will cost our Commonwealth tens of billions of dollars and cause incalculable harm for the communities who are, and will continue to be most impacted—threatening homes, health, and lives. Those who are most responsible for causing the problem should pay some of the costs. We intend to introduce legislation that would empower our state government to hold those corporations who have contributed the most to climate change financially accountable”


Read More
27 May

Skyrocketing Utility Costs: Why Is My Con Ed Bill So High?

A Virtual Town Hall recorded on Thursday, May 26th, 2022, with State Senator Liz Krueger, Richard A. Berkley, Esq., Executive Director of the Public Utility Law Project (PULP), and Laurie Wheelock, Esq., Deputy General Counsel and Deputy Director of the Public Utility Law Project (PULP).

Full video of the event can be viewed by clicking here.


Important Links:

— PULP PowerPoint Presentation



PULP Toll Free Hotline: 877-669-2572


— ConEd smart meter dashboard


— NYSERDA’s Solar For All program


— Opt out of the ConEd smart meter


—  ConEd’s tariff:

Read More
24 May

Sen. Krueger Joins 71 NYC Electeds Urging MTA To Restore Subway Booth Transactions

New York City – Today, State Senator Liz Krueger joined 71 City elected officials, as well at the TWU Local 100, in urging the MTA to restore subway booth transactions that have been suspended during the COVID 19 pandemic.

The letter can be viewed below, and can be downloaded as a PDF by clicking here.

Read More
23 May

Sen. Krueger’s Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors Session VIII: Reframing Aging: Building an Age Friendly City

Senator Liz Krueger’s 2022 Virtual Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors

“Aging in Place: Living Well in the Community”

Session VIII: Reframing Aging: Building an Age Friendly City

Thursday, May 19th, from 10 am – 11:30 am

The majority of older people want to age in place, which is possible with the right support and planning. This multi-part roundtable series will bring together experts and thought leaders to help us understand some of the vital components needed to age well in the community.

If we want the resources we need to age well in the community, we must reframe the way we think and talk about getting older. When we view aging in a more positive frame, it becomes easier to take action to change things in our community to support older adults. Learn about how you can work to make your neighborhood more age friendly, and find out about key policies in New York City that still need to be addressed to support us as we age.

Full video of the event can be viewed by clicking here.

The May 19th Roundtable features:

– Crystal Hudson, Aging Committee Chair, New York City Council

– Elana Kieffer, Acting Director, Center for Healthy Aging, New York Academy of Medicine

– Allison Nickerson, Executive Director, LiveOn NY

– Alden Prouty, Member, Carnegie Hill Village

– Mario Rubano, MPH, Policy Associate, Center for Health Aging, New York Academy Of Medicine

Important Links:

— New York Academy of Medicine PowerPoint

–COVID Information

Link to the NYC COVID-19 Alert Level website:

If you want to speak about your eligibility for treatment and you do not have a health care provider, or you are uninsured, you can call 212-268-4319 to speak with a health care provider.

Link to the website with information about the tests:

Link to order the tests:, or you can call 1-800-232-0233


–Live On New York

Reframing Aging:


–New York Academy of Medicine (NYAM)

NYAM Age-friendly Neighborhoods webpage:

Creating and Age-friendly NYC One Neighborhood at a Time:

Thriving Together: How to Sustain, Grow, and Fund, your Age-friendly Neighborhood Organization:


–Senator Krueger’s Senior Resource Guide

Email to request a copy at

Call to request a copy 212.490.9535


–Senator Kruger’s Guide “What To Do with All that Stuff”


–Department for the Aging

Aging Connect is the New York City Department for the Aging’s information and referral contact center for older adults and their families.



–Councilmember Crystal Hudson’s Office



–Information about the Initiative to Modernize Senior Centers.


–Senior Move Manager Website

Type in your zip code and find a local service who can assist older adults to move their belongings.


–Elder Abuse Services

Carter Burden Network – Community Elder Mistreatment and Abuse Prevention Services

Services include safety planning, crisis intervention, court advocacy, legal guidance, community education programs, coordination with policy and a safe place to talk.

917.409.1261, Ext 463


Manhattan District Attorney’s Elder Abuse Unit



New York City Elder Abuse Center

The NYC Elder Abuse Center (NYCEAC) is proud to offer a unique service to concerned persons in the lives of elder abuse victims. A concerned person is a family member, friend, or neighbor impacted by elder abuse.

Tel # 844.746.6905 (M-F 9 am – 5PM


–Links to videos and resources for 2022 Roundtable Season Series

Good Medical Care for Older Adults:

A 4 M Framework to for Medical Care:

Advanced Planning: Health Care Proxies and Living Wills:

The Age Friendly Home:

Medicaid Planning:

Solo Aging:


Read More
16 May

Sen. Krueger Holds Press Conference for the Sex Trade Survivors Justice and Equality Act

(Albany) – On Tuesday, May 10th, 2022, at 1:30 pm, Senator Liz Krueger, Assembly Member Pamela Hunter and allies held a press conference in support of the Sex Trade Survivors Justice and Equality Act. This legislation would be an additional tool to prevent sex trafficking in New York. Partial decriminalization calls for the end of arrests and incarceration of people engaged in prostitution. It offers the exit and support services they need, while still holding to account pimps, brothel owners, traffickers, sex buyers and exploiters.

Full video of the event can be viewed by clicking here.

Speakers include:

· Senator Liz Krueger (NY-28)

· Assembly Member Pamela Hunter (NY-128)

· Cristián Eduardo: Survivor Leader at Sanctuary for Families

· Jayne Bigelsen: Vice President of Advocacy, Covenant House New York

· Sonia Ossorio: President, NOW New York

As co-sponsors of the Sex Trade Survivors Justice and Equality Act, Senator Krueger and Assembly Member Hunter are eager to see the framework for partial decriminalization – known as the “Equality Model”, adopted by Sweden, Norway, France, Canada, Ireland, Israel, among other nations – applied in New York State. The Sex Trade Survivors Justice and Equality Act will:

1. Decriminalize people in prostitution, repeal the crime of selling sex, prevent people in the sex trade from being charged as an accomplice to promoting or compelling prostitution when they are helping others also in prostitution without profiting, prohibit the usage of condoms as evidence in criminal trials for prostitution.

2. Expand access to comprehensive social services, extendthe legal protections and comprehensive services afforded to minors arrested for prostitution under New York’s Safe Harbor law, to cover young adults up to age 24, enable a broader pool of people to access social services from organizations combating gender violence by aligning New York’s definition of human trafficking with the federal definition, create a regionally, racially, and sexually diverse State task force with representation from people in the sex trade and advocates, to ensure access and administration of social services to people in prostitution across New York.

3. Strengthen laws against trafficking, while laws that hold accountable pimps, sex traffickers, and other profiteers remain unchanged. Eliminate a loophole in NY state law that prevents sex buyers from being charge with “promoting prostitution” when they traffic people to themselves, strengthen protections for children by eliminating an “ignorance defense” afforded to those who buy sex from children under 11 (1st degree), 15 (2nd degree), or in a school zone.

4. Advance criminal justice reformby clearing survivors’ records for crimes committed while under the control of their exploiter, automatically expunge all past charges for prostitution and loitering for the purpose of prostitution, address the over-incarceration of people of color and implicit bias in law enforcement by penalizing the misdemeanor crime of buying sex with a fine (instead of jail) and utilizing an income-based fine scale to incentivize law enforcement to target buyers with disposable income. A portion of these fines will be directed to a victims’ compensation fund.

Read More
03 May

Sen. Krueger’s Virtual Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors Session VII – Technology Can Work For You

Senator Liz Krueger’s 2022 Virtual Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors

“Aging in Place: Living Well in the Community”

Session VII: Technology Can Work For You

Thursday, April 28th, from 10 am – 11:30 am

The majority of older people want to age in place, which is possible with the right support and planning. This multi-part roundtable series will bring together experts and thought leaders to help us understand some of the vital components needed to age well in the community.

Feeling frustrated and defeated by technology? Don’t think it’s right for you? The April 28th Roundtable presentation will provide information that may change your mind. You will learn about tech classes designed specifically for older adults, and new tech products to support us as we age, including information about devices to help individuals with hearing loss. Finally, if you believe that tech devices are designed without your needs in mind, learn about the research at MIT’s AgeLab dedicated to improving product design and committed to including the older adult perspective.

The April 28th Roundtable features:

– Marco DiGirolomo, New York State Program Manager, Senior Planet and Older Adults Technology Services (OATS) from AARP

– Chaiwoo Lee, PhD, Research Scientist, MIT AgeLab

– Greg Olsen, Acting Director, New York State Office for the Aging

– Carolyn Ginsburg Stern, Assistant Director of Outreach and Strategic Initiatives, Center for Hearing and Communication


Video of the event can be viewed by CLICKING HERE.


Important Links:

– PowerPoint from Chaiwoo Lee

– PowerPoint from Greg Olsen

– PowerPoint from Carolyn Ginsburg Stern


–COVID Information

NYC COVID-19 Alert System:

Link to the state order – 3/2/22 NYS DOH Commissioner’s Determination on Masking In Certain Indoor Settings:

City-run brick & mortar and mobile testing sites:  City distribution sites where you can pick up free COVID-19 at-home rapid tests:


–Older Adult Technology Services (OATS)

OATS Hotline Number:  888-713-3495

–Federal government new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) for low-income households get help paying for internet and devices.

ACP 877.745.1930


–Center for Hearing and Communication

CHC’s Website:


–Free Hearing Screenings:


–Products for Hearing Loss


–Support for Hearing Loss


–Carolyn’s Contact Information:



–Senator Krueger’s Senior Resource Guide

Email to request a copy at

Call to request a copy 212.490.9535


–MIT Age Lab


 Links for Tech Assistance

–Search and Care

Search and Care’s “Silver Circles” program has been helping older adults increase their connectivity through the use of technology, in both one-on- one and group sessions. Pre-COVID, these sessions took place in our agency office and directly in clients’ homes. For now, all sessions are being conducted remotely (telephonic or video chat) until safe to do otherwise.

Silver Circles


–Lenox Hill Neighborhood House

 Members of Lenox Hill Neighborhood House’s Older Adult Centers can sign up for Tech Help or request the class schedule.

 Phone 212-218-0477


Non-members age 60 and over can contact 212- 218-0319 to become a member.



DOROT has created a series of basic technology guides on a variety of topics, including Zoom, that are available to all. Designed for older adults, the guides have clear directions, are written in everyday language and include large pictures of what is seen on the screen during each step.

Read More
03 Mar

Krueger Urges Adams To Maintain Vaccination And School Masking Policy

New York City – Today, State Senator Liz Krueger released a letter to New York City Mayor Eric Adams, urging him to maintain the Key to NYC vaccination requirements and public school masking requirements. The full letter can be viewed here and is reprinted below.

“We all want life to get back to some semblance of normal – that’s why it’s so important to avoid declaring victory too early,” said Senator Krueger. “I urge Mayor Adams to retain the Key to NYC vaccination requirement and the school masking requirement. As we have seen over and over during the pandemic, when we let our guard down too soon it only serves to prolong the crisis. The science shows us that we are not there yet.”

In her letter, Senator Krueger emphasizes the layered approach to protection provided by the vaccination and masking requirements, the unique characteristics of New York City that require different approaches from the rest of the state, as well as the significant risks posed by new variants and future waves of the virus. She also points to the deep inequities that exist in the city’s public schools, where vaccination rates range from a high of 92.7% of students fully vaccinated to a low of just 9.9%, as well as the disparate impacts of overcrowding, poor ventilation, and high localized community transmission rates. Instead of removing these protections now, Senator Krueger recommends the use of clear and appropriate science-driven metrics to guide policy changes.

“For the sake of our kids and their teachers, our small business owners, our front-line workers, and our vulnerable neighbors, we cannot afford to give in to wishful thinking or political expediency and risk another devastating wave that sets back our city’s recovery yet again,” Senator Krueger continued. “Vaccination and masking work, they have helped us get to where we are today with case numbers way down – now is the time to be smart and stay the course. ”


March 3, 2022

Mayor Eric Adams
City Hall
New York, NY 10007

Dear Mayor Adams:

I write to express my strong opposition to the pending changes to the Key to NYC and public-school masking policies that were announced February 27 on Twitter. I urge you to consider the distinct likelihood that we will face another surge in the near future, and to adopt more measured policies that establish target metrics for relaxing critical safety measures while protecting the progress we have made in the ongoing battle against COVID-19.

As a large, densely-populated metropolitan city with a majority of multi-resident households and buildings with subpar ventilation systems, New York City is vulnerable to rapid spread of COVID-19. Since the pandemic struck, New York City and State have shown remarkable leadership in following the science and establishing evidence-based policies to help fight COVID-19 and protect public health in a manner that aims to reduce health inequities. Although no one can predict precisely what the next phase of the pandemic will look like, public health experts anticipate the rise of new variants and possible evolution of the virus due to conditions still being ripe for mutations. Public health policy experts advise this is the time to plan and prepare for the next phase of the pandemic rather than prematurely declare victory.

Implementing the Key to NYC program enabled dining, fitness, and entertainment and meeting venues to re-open and conduct business indoors more safely, particularly once patrons and staff were required to be fully vaccinated. The program has also motivated individuals to get vaccinated who would not have done so otherwise. I have heard from many constituents, older adults in particular, who were happy to dine out again once the Key to NYC program was implemented because they felt safe.

In addition to the benefits of establishing the Key to NYC program, I would like to highlight a number of important arguments for why the program’s vaccination requirement should not be lifted under the current circumstances:

  • Getting vaccinated is the best protection against severe illness from COVID-19 and helps to reduce transmission. If the Key to NYC program is lifted, this layer of protection in establishments that are higher risk for transmission will be eliminated.
  • After the CDC released updated mask recommendations on February 25, the President of the American Medical Association (AMA) issued a statement, strongly encouraging everyone to continue masking indoors:
  • Lifting the vaccination requirement will be counterproductive to the goal of promoting economic recovery while protecting public health. Lifting the vaccination requirement may actually encourage more unvaccinated people to come to NYC, thereby increasing community transmission and prolonging the pandemic.
  • Unvaccinated and immunocompromised people, as well as older adults are at greater risk for severe illness and need to be protected. Children under the age of 5 will not be approved to get vaccinated for at least several months. Minors are unable to get vaccinated without parental consent.
  • It is likely that the Key to NYC vaccination requirement would need to be reinstated to help keep dining, entertainment, and fitness establishments in business while managing future surges. Reinstituting the Key to NYC program would be all the more difficult due to increased frustration with changing policies.
  • Lifting the vaccination requirement for indoor dining will increase the risk to low-wage servers and staff. As we know, restaurants are already facing severe staffing shortages.
  • Many people feel safe enough to dine, exercise, or attend events indoors because of the vaccination requirement. Some people decide to visit NYC, as the Key to NYC program allows them to attend the theatre and dine, etc. in a safer environment. If the requirement is lifted, this could harm tourism and hurt businesses.
  • As we have witnessed, when community transmission increases, members of multi-resident households are at greater risk of transmitting the virus to each other.
  • Our health care workers and hospital systems have been extremely stretched for more than two years and there is a staffing shortage. Our health care systems cannot continue to endure this burden.

Key to NYC provides an important layer of protection at a time when new variants have been mutating every several months. While the existing vaccinations have proven remarkably effective at preventing severe illness and death, particularly for people who have received booster doses, the vaccines do not stop all disease transmission and we do not know how much protection they will provide against future variants. Based on the current status of the pandemic, it would be premature to lift the vaccination requirement at this time. I strongly encourage continuing the Key to NYC vaccination requirement until appropriate metrics are met. Such metrics could include transition out of the pandemic; achieving a 85-90% vaccination rate of all NYC residents, including children under the age of 5; and/or surges decreasing in severity such that our health care systems and testing infrastructure are not on the brink of collapse when case rates spike.

I must also express strong opposition to lifting the masking requirement for all students and staff in NYC public schools. While case and hospitalization rates have decreased dramatically since the recent Omicron surge, the experiences of the last two years indicate we are likely to face another surge in a matter of months. Now is the time to focus on maintaining low community transmission and strengthening our public health infrastructure to be better prepared for future surges.

Even though the CDC and New York State have announced changes to masking requirements in schools, it is premature to lift school mask requirements in all NYC public schools. The following considerations demonstrate the need for a more measured policy:

  • Wearing a mask is an essential public health safety measure to help prevent students, school staff, and their households from contracting the Coronavirus, becoming hospitalized, and even dying. Despite accusations to the contrary, research has shown that mask wearing is an effective mitigation strategy in schools.
  • The high transmissibility and severity of COVID-19 has required use of a layered approach, including mask wearing, to protect public health because no one safety measure provides 100% protection. COVID-19 vaccinations, masking, and testing, as well as other essential safety measures are all part of the layered approach.
  • Removing the mask requirement fails to take into account enormous disparities in school vaccination rates, concerning environmental conditions in schools, school staffing shortages, and other aggravating factors. School masking requirements must be flexible and responsive to these conditions.
  • Lifting masking requirements in all public schools will be unsafe due to low vaccination rates of children age 5-12 and the enormous disparities in school vaccination rates. The vaccination rate of NYC public schools ranges from a low of 12% of students who have received their first dose and 9.9% who are fully vaccinated to a high of 93.8% of students who have received their first dose and 92.7% who are fully vaccinated; and children below the age of 5 are not yet eligible to be vaccinated. Lifting the mask requirement in all public schools will create additional burdens and inequities where vaccination rates are lower, particularly for unvaccinated and immunocompromised students, staff, and those with whom they interact. Mask wearing in many schools continues to be pertinent and necessary
  • Many public schools with the lowest vaccination rates are also the most overcrowded, have poor ventilation, and are in communities with higher COVID-19 infection rates.Masking provides additional protection for our children, including those who are not yet eligible to get vaccinated.
  • The benefits of masking cannot be supplanted with testing. Wearing a mask helps to prevent transmission, while the function of testing is to diagnose, provide surveillance, and interrupt the chain of transmission. School safety measures should include robust testing and mask wearing, along with other proven safety measures as appropriate.

Masking in schools is a core safety measure that has proven effective in helping to prevent community transmission. Instead of removing the mask requirement, it would be much more prudent to establish metrics as an indicator of when it is reasonable for a school to remove masking requirements. Metrics could include, for example, a minimum school vaccination rate of 70-80%, and a maximum community or city positivity rate of 3% or 7-day average case rate of 10 per 100K individuals.

In summary, this is the time to focus on maintaining low community transmission levels, as well as on planning and preparing for the next phase of the pandemic, while implementing measured policies to safely relax mask-wearing and vaccination requirements. The well-being of our health care workers, capacity of our hospital systems, and financial health of our city depend on our ability to prevent or minimize the rise of the next surge. We will not accomplish this if we relax too many layers of our protection too quickly. Policy decisions must follow the science, be responsive to the unique characteristics of New York City, and protect vulnerable New Yorkers. I strongly urge you to adopt the above-mentioned policy suggestions.

Thank you for your consideration of the policy considerations and requests detailed in this letter. I look forward to hearing your response.

Thank you,

Liz Krueger
State Senator

Read More
22 Feb

Sen. Krueger’s Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors, Session IV – This Is Living: The Age Friendly Home

Senator Liz Krueger’s 2022 Virtual Roundtable for Boomers and Seniors

“Aging in Place: Living Well in the Community”

Session IV: “This Is Living: The Age Friendly Home”

Thursday, February 17th from 10 am – 11:30 am

The majority of older people want to age in place, which is possible with the right support and planning. This multi-part roundtable series will bring together experts and thought leaders to help us understand some of the vital components needed to age well in the community.

The February 17th Roundtable will offer information about creating an age friendly living space, and how to access resources to help you make the minor repairs needed to age in place safely. Additionally, you will hear about the Department for the Aging’s support programs, including fall prevention, case management, Friendly Visiting to reduce social isolation, and the Assigned Counsel Program, which provides legal representation in Housing Court.

The February 17th Roundtable features:

– Brian Pape, Design for Aging Committee, at the NYC Chapter of the American Institute for Architecture

– Eileen Mullarkey, Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Social Services, NYC Department for the Aging (DFTA)

– Laudrey Lamadieu, Senior Director Senior Services, Bureau of Community Services, DFTA

– Ygnacio Silvestre, Director, Assigned Counsel Project, DFTA

– Anna Martinez, Director of Project Equal Access, New York City Commission on Human Rights.


To view full video of the event, CLICK HERE.


Important Links:


Link to the list of Manhattan distribution locations:

Link to the NYC DOHMH incentives web page:


— American Institute of Architects NY


Aging in Place Guide for building Owners:


— NYC Department for the Aging

Aging Connect is the New York City Department for the Aging’s information and referral contact center for older adults and their families: 212-244-6469

DFTA Newsletter:


— Home Repair Resources

New York Foundation for Senior Citizens –

Home Repair Program: 212-962-7655


Met Council – Senior Repair Program



–NYC Commission on Human Rights


Disability Brochure:

Disability Fact Sheet:


–Senior Resource Guide

Email to request a copy at

Call to request a copy 212.490.9535


–Housing Ambassador Organizations

NYC Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) partners with community-based service providers in New York City who help people prepare and apply for Housing Connect affordable housing lotteries. Housing Ambassadors can provide information and assistance with the application process.







— Link to Senator Krueger’s January 26th Advanced Planning Document Roundtable


–Clutter Guide


–Older Adults Technology Services (OATS)

Engages trains and supports older adults in using technology to improve their quality of life and enhance their social and civic engagement.


Read More
09 Feb

Statement From Senator Liz Krueger On State Pension Fund Divestment From Shale Oil And Gas Companies

New York City – State Senator Liz Krueger released the following statement regarding today’s announcement by State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli that the Common Retirement Fund will divest from 21 shale oil and gas companies. Today’s divestment, covering $238 million in holdings, is the largest single divestment action in the Fund’s history, and builds on previous divestments from oil sands and coal companies. These actions are part of the Fund’s historic commitment to divest from the riskiest fossil fuel companies by 2025 and attain portfolio-wide net zero by 2040:

“Today’s divestment announcement demonstrates yet again that the dirty fossil fuels of the past are a bad bet for the future. If we’re going to be able to pass on a livable planet to our children and grandchildren, we know that shale oil and gas need to stay right where they are – in the ground. Recent price spikes should remind us just how risky it is to continue to rely on fracked gas for heating and power. Those price spikes also make clear how risky it is to continue to invest in shale gas: when the price is low, it’s unprofitable, and when the price is high it drives society even faster toward renewable alternatives. I commend Comptroller DiNapoli and his team for continuing to protect the fund, current and future retirees, and taxpayers from unacceptable levels of climate risk, and making clear that the era of dirty fossil fuels must and will come to an end.”


Read More
03 Feb

Krueger, May, Fahy Introduce Gas Transition & Affordable Energy Act

Albany – Today, State Senators Liz Krueger and Rachel May, and Assemblymember Pat Fahy announced the introduction of the Gas Transition & Affordable Energy Act, S.8198. The legislation would remove statutory requirements and ratepayer subsidies that drive the expansion of the gas system, and require the Public Service Commission to adopt rules and develop a statewide gas service transition plan to ensure equity, reliability, and affordability in the process of decommissioning the gas system in line with CLCPA mandates.

“At this point there is no question that the transition off of fossil gas and on to clean and renewable systems for heating and cooling our homes is coming, but we are woefully behind in preparing for the transition,” said Senator Krueger. “Our current approach is obviously not sustainable in any sense of the word. Without long-term, comprehensive planning that centers affordability and equity, low- and moderate-income New Yorkers could find themselves shut out of the benefits of renewable green options, and bearing an increasingly large share of the cost of obsolete gas infrastructure. As with so many climate and energy issues, we are playing catch-up. It’s time to stop digging ourselves deeper into this hole, and start planning our way out.”

“How New York government meets the challenge of realigning its current reliance on natural gas with the new clean energy targets in law will determine our state’s future sustainability in all areas of life and for every New Yorker regardless of economic status,” said Senator May. “Production of natural gas emits large amounts of methane, and burning it emits CO2, a combination that makes it a major culprit in greenhouse gas emissions. The transition away from this dirty fuel cannot start soon enough. I am grateful to the many groups and individuals who contributed their expertise, and especially to Senator Krueger and her office for their leadership in crafting this bill. It provides a new blueprint for the Public Service Commission to use to construct New York’s affordable and equitable gas-free future.”

“New York State’s heating, hot water, and cooking in our largely fossil fuel-powered building stock accounts for an astounding one-third of our state’s greenhouse gas emissions every year, which roughly matches that of the transportation sector,” said Assemblymember Fahy. “Together, these two sectors account for two-thirds of New York’s overall emissions, providing a clear blueprint for where New York can begin to significantly reduce emissions. We are not going to meet our ambitious climate goals laid out in the CLCPA unless New York moves aggressively to transition itself off a reliance on fossil fuels. By developing a statewide gas service transition plan aligned with the state’s climate and emission reduction targets, and ending ratepayer subsidization of fossil fuel infrastructure, we are more likely to meet these aggressive—and vital—goals in the years to come.”

Fossil fuels burned in buildings for heating, hot water, and cooking account for approximately one third of all greenhouse gas emissions in New York State. Meeting the CLCPA mandates for economy-wide emission reductions across all sectors will require, among other things, converting buildings throughout the state from heating and cooking with combustible fuels to using non-emitting sources such as energy-efficient air, ground, and water sourced electric heat pumps and electric and induction stoves. New York City recently enacted legislation to require all new small buildings to be all-electric by 2024, and larger buildings by 2027, and Governor Hochul has proposed a state-wide all-electric buildings mandate by 2027 in her Executive Budget.

In order to meet these statutory requirements, and those of the CLCPA, New York State urgently needs to reform its oversight and regulation of gas utilities and the gas distribution system. Currently, the Public Service Law promotes the expansion of the gas system by establishing a statutory obligation on the part of gas utilities to provide gas service to any new customer on request, with existing customers forced to subsidize new, often uneconomical service connections. Continued expansion of the gas system is moving New York further and further away from the climate justice directives and binding emissions limits of the CLCPA.

To meet the CLCPA’s bold climate and equity mandates, New York will need to drastically reduce gas use. This poses a particular challenge for gas utilities because their business models are currently premised on expanding — not contracting — gas infrastructure and services. Allowing the tension between the Public Service Law and the CLCPA to go unaddressed will significantly delay achievement of the CLCPA mandates while dramatically exacerbating affordability and equity challenges. Low income New Yorkers will suffer the most if the state fails to properly plan for the inevitable contraction of the gas system, as they will be among a shrinking group of customers burdened with the cost of maintaining an increasingly obsolete distribution network.

The Gas Transition & Affordable Energy Act will give the Public Service Commission the authority and direction to align gas utility regulations and system planning with the equitable achievement of the CLCPA’s climate justice and emission reduction mandates. Specifically, the Act will:

– Ensure that the Public Service Law regarding regulation and oversight of gas utilities will provide for the timely and strategic retirement of the gas distribution system in a just and affordable manner as required to meet the climate justice and emission reduction mandates of the CLCPA.

– Ensure that the Public Service Commission has the statutory authority and direction to align utility regulations and planning with the CLCPA, and require the PSC to take a proactive role in the timely identification and amendment of any laws, regulations, or rulings that may impede achievement of CLCPA mandates.

– End ratepayer-subsidized utility incentives for fossil fuel expansion (the so-called “100 foot rule”) while ensuring the equitable provision of electric service and efficient heating, cooling, cooking, and hot water services.

– Require the PSC, within one year, to develop a statewide gas service transition plan based on clear biannual gas sales reduction targets, robust analysis, and consideration of several electrification pathways.

– Ensure affordable access to electric heating and cooling services and protect low-and-moderate income customers from undue burdens as they electrify their buildings.

– Clarify that municipal gas bans are not preempted under New York State law.

Sonal Jessel, Director of Policy at WE ACT for Environmental Justice, said: “A recent study from Stanford University found that methane, a potent greenhouse gas that causes climate change, is being emitted from gas stoves even when they are turned off. And that small homes with poor ventilation – like most apartments in New York City, especially in low-income communities and communities of color – surpass the federal safety limit for NO2 exposure faster than you can boil water on a gas stove. This exposure to harmful indoor air pollution is yet another example of how frontline communities have been forced to bear the brunt of the air pollution and climate crisis caused by a heavily subsidized fossil fuel industry, which is why we need to pass this legislation and end the subsidized support of an industry that’s turned our communities into sacrifice zones.”

Conor Bambrick, Director of Climate Policy for Environmental Advocates NY, said: “The days of burning fossil fuels to heat our homes and cook are food are quickly coming to an end. For a smooth and fair transition, we need coordinated planning and affordable policies that prioritize equity. This legislation does just that and we look forward to working with Senators Krueger and May and Assembly Member Fahy to see this become law.”

Roger Downs, Conservation Director, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, said: “Building an emissions free, renewable energy driven society is difficult enough without allowing the fossil fuel industry to keep their thumbs on the scale – especially in our very own homes.  The Sierra Club applauds Senator Krueger, Senator May, and Assemblymember Fahy for introducing the ‘Gas Transition and Affordable Energy Act’, which will end subsidized gas hookups in New York and create a level playing field where renewable heat, and other electrified technologies can thrive. These climate friendly alternatives to heating, cooling, cooking, and drying will not only help us meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals, but achieve a standard of living that is healthier, more cost effective and efficient.”

Richard Schrader, New York Legislative and Policy Director for NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council), said: “This legislation puts in place the gas utility regulation and planning framework needed to achieve New York’s climate goals in a just and equitable manner. Senator Krueger’s leadership on this critical bill will help protect low-income New Yorkers as the state transitions away from fossil gas use to a clean energy economy with healthy, efficient buildings that have electric heating, hot water, and cooking.”

Sherri Billimoria, Manager at RMI, said: “While many states across the country are beginning to tackle the need to transition off gas, this bill represents clear leadership and strong action from New York State. The bill’s focus on developing a statewide gas utility decarbonization plan and updating outdated utility regulation sets New York up for an equitable, thoughtful transition away from fossil fuels.”

Jessica Azulay, Executive Director of Alliance for a Green Economy, said: “If New York is serious about meeting its legally mandated climate goals, this legislation must pass. This bill removes the fossil fuel subsidies that drive gas expansion and gas bill increases and creates a much needed planning process to ensure an equitable and affordable transition to renewable heating, cooking, and hot water.”

Meagan Burton, Senior Attorney at Earthjustice, said: “As the climate crisis and pollution from gas use in buildings worsens, New York must move buildings off fossil fuels. This bill will enable a managed and intentional transition off gas, will put an end to subsidies for gas line extensions and will protect low to moderate income customers from shouldering the costs as we electrify our buildings. Earthjustice thanks Senator Krueger, Senator May, and Assemblymember Fahy for introducing this legislation and urges swift passage.”

Alex Beauchamp, Northeast Region Director at Food & Water Watch, said: “This crucial legislation ends a wasteful subsidy that incentivizes the growth of gas systems that harm our health and cook the planet. At a time when we must pull out all the stops to move off fossil fuels, subsidizing the expansion of fracked gas is unconscionable. The legislature should pass the bill immediately.”

The Gas Transition and Affordable Energy Act is supported by:
– WE ACT for Environmental Justice
– Environmental Advocates NY
– Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter
– Alliance for a Green Economy
– Earthjustice
– Food & Water Watch
– Mothers Out Front NY
– Sane Energy Project
– New Yorkers for Clean Power
– Network for a Sustainable Tomorrow
– Association for Energy Affordability


Read More
Sign up for LizList